The Marketplace of Anti-Communism: Shopkeeper Ideology and the Cultural Political Economy of Representation (1960-1980)
SIYASAL-JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCES, cilt.34, sa.2, ss.238-252, 2025 (TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 34 Sayı: 2
- Basım Tarihi: 2025
- Doi Numarası: 10.26650/siyasal.2025.34.1646920
- Dergi Adı: SIYASAL-JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCES
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM), Sobiad Atıf Dizini, European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Science (ERIH PLUS)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.238-252
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Maltepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
This study examines how Turkish shopkeepers constructed their class identity through anti-communist
discourse between 1960 and 1980, during Turkey’s Import Substitution Industrialization period. Drawing on
Bob Jessop’s Cultural Political Economy framework, integrated with Van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis, it
demonstrates how shopkeepers actively transformed their structural contradictions into political agency,
rather than merely reflecting their economic interests. A systematic analysis of four organizational period-
icals published by shopkeeper unions, alongside national newspapers, reveals a three-phase discursive
evolution: from an administrative vocabulary focused on economic concerns (early 1970s), through narra-
tives of political alienation and representational crisis (mid-1970s), to a militant anti-communist rhetoric
(late 1970s). The analysis shows how material anxieties were linguistically rearticulated into cultural narra-
tives of national integrity through processes of ‘semiotic transformation.’ Shopkeepers’ anti-communism
emerged not from ideological manipulation or mechanical class positions, but through sophisticated
meaning-making practices that fused economic grievances with nationalist-conservative imaginaries. By
reframing their structural vulnerabilities as moral authority and patriotic duty, shopkeepers were able to
transcend their contradictory class position—being dependent on state protection yet constrained by its
regulations, opposing big capital while fearing working-class mobilization. This study contributes to our
understanding of class formation among the petty bourgeoisie in late-developing capitalist countries,
revealing how anti-communist discourse functioned not as a top-down imposition, but as a symbolic
resource for forging political unity across divergent material interests.